Draft Night 2026 - The Mendoza Line
Sorry, about going dark lately, took a while to recover from that season, big night tonight, looking forward to your takes from round to round!
posted by Raider Take at 4:08 PM
Thursday, April 23, 2026
DEFENDING THE NATION!
- Subscribe to Raider Take
- GOOGLE ADS
A Must Read
117 Comments:
With the first pick of the 2026 NFL Draft, the Las Vegas Raiders select Fernando Mendoza, QB, Indiana
It's official. Mendoza!!
Hopefully,Jacob Rodriguez is next
Big relief hearing Mendoza's name called. Always concerned the Raiders will do something stupid. Now it's in the books. Raiders still need lots of help but probably nowhere more than WR and CB. That's my call for the next pick.
Denzel Boston looks like a reliable target for Mendoza. We've seen nothing from Bech or Thorton to suggest either can be a starter. Boston looks like a baller and would be monster choice compared to either of those 2nd year players.
NY,
I am going to reserve judgment on Bech and Thornton due to the inefficiency of Pete Carroll and company, as well as Darien Porter, JJ Pegues (a true NT), and others the previous regime wrote off.
With that said, here are my second round picks I'd love to see. Of course, Jacob Rodriguez (ILB, TX Tech) was who I mock drafted here, and would love to see us trade down to select him. In a 3-4 defense, he and Crosby would light it up. He truly reminds me of Greg Biekert. All-in-all, I'd love to see the Raiders trade down here and get more picks. Other picks I'd be happy with:
Kayden McDonald (NT, Ohio St)
Emmanuel McNeil-Warren (S, Toledo)
Players we can trade down for, or possible pick in the 3rd Round:
Chase Bisontis (IOL, Georgia)
Gennings Dunker (IOL, Iowa)
Elijah Sarratt (WR, Indiana)
Emmanuel Pregnon (OG, Oregon)
Brandon Cisse (CB, South Carolina)
Kage Casey (OT, Boise St)
Sarratt was someone I'd like to see the Raiders draft (for Mendoza) but waiting until the 3-4 round to draft a WR when the Raiders have no #1 or #2 doesn't make sense. If Boston is there at #36, look for him to become a Raider, IMO.
This is when the fun starts.
Yes, agree - nice to see no monkey business last night, just the straight up, as-expected pick that made the most sense. Phew.
There seems to bee this blanket assumption, even among non-Raiders fans, that Mendoza is an automatic superstar. I have no doubt that his floor is solid, and the ceiling is high. I'd be shocked if he's a bust. But...how great will he actually be. He has to get at least to Justin Herbert level for this to pan out, right? Fine if he's not Mahomes/Allen/Stafford level, but gotta be a consistent top 10 QB to really push this team into perennial contender status, versus say a Derek Carr high-functioning but non-elite type. It'll take some time for this to pan out, but at least we finally have a shot at QB now.
Take,
The best comparison I have seen is to Drew Bledsoe. Fernando is rhe same height and weight, and has similar arm strength. He is a film watcher, and leader. I think he will be fine
First, I guess the post above when I was typing my name I was already thinking of addressing Take. The above post is Raider Nate 75, sorry.
Second, what a weird day 2 of drafting for the Raiders. Treydan Stukes (S, Arizona) was the pick after trading down with the Texans, who selected Kayden McDonald (NT, Ohio St), someone we could have picked; and Emmanuel McNeil-Warren (S, Toledo) still on the board, who I had ranked higher. I seriously had Stukes more of a middle third round pick. Don't get me wrong, it's not a bad pick, but its not a flashy 2nd Round pick either.
3rd Round, we had two picks from the trade with Texans. First, we went with Keyron Crawford (EDGE, Auburn). Again, not a flashy pick here. I thought Romello Height (EDGE, TX Tech) was a higher pick here, as well as Dominique Orange (NT, Iowa St) would have been the better pick. With the second pick in the 3rd, we hit it out of the park with Trey Zuhn (IOL, TX A&M). He has played C, G, and OT He was one of my mock draft picks, but apparently his stock rose higher.
For tomorrow in the 4th Round, the pick I am looking at now is Zxavian Harris (NT, Mississippi), Darrell Jackson Jr (NT, Florida), or we can nab Tim Keenan III (NT, Bama) in the 5th or 6th. If we don't go NT, Elijah Sarratt is still available at WR, or Jude Bowry (OT, Boston College).
Finally, the Steelers selected Drew Allar (QB, Penn St) who I think is the underrated QB in the draft. He was overlooked due to injury, but he's going to be a great QB. Steelers are hoping to get Rodgers back, and if they do, that will allow Allar to not only heal, but have a year to get ready. This pick was WAY better than the Ty Simpson pick the Rams did yesterday in the first round; and boy did McVay look unhappy about that pick.
Also, the Bills selecting Davison Igbinosun (CB, Ohio St) late in the 2nd was a steal; I had him at late 1st, early 2nd Round talent.
It's been an interesting draft, the big boards for teams always baffle me. Be interesting tomorrow as well.
I agree, Take, Mendonza is not a sure thing. For me, he represents opportunity that the Raiders previously did not have. Like two years ago when six QBs were off the board before the Raiders pick. But Mendoza is not just a #1 pick either. This kid ran the table in college football, perfect record, Heisman Trophy, National Championship. He's a winner!
But he will need help. O-line, coaching and something Derek Carr didn't have, a defense.
I was disappointed the Raiders didn't draft a WR, but I also don't understand dropping back and letting the Texans draft DT McDonald. Did the Raiders just have another Jalen Carter moment, passing up consensus top talent? And what happened to building in the trenches? They channeled Al and took the fast 40 guy.
The other two picks seemed meh, like project players with less experience and will need significant coaching to make a dent.
But perhaps the most perplexing pick in the draft (for me) wasn't the Raiders. It was the Rams. Contenders for the SB, they used their high first round pick on a future QB - Ty Simpson. They could have taken several players ready to make significant contribution this year... maybe get them over the hump.
Headline: "Texans DT Kayden McDonald: I’m gonna show I’m the best player in this class"
McDonald was available to the Raiders and they took Stukes instead. That could be a backstory this year, much like the Tyree Wilson pick over Jalen Cater a few years ago. We all know how that went.
I really hoped the Raiders would make a splash in the draft. WR is such a huge void, yet they still haven't drafted one... that I'm aware.
Speaking of the aforementioned Tyree Wilson, whom the Raiders drafted with their top pick a few years ago... instead of drafting Jalen Carter (who is a monster). Raiders are trading Wilson and a 7th round pick for a 5th round pick.
Ouch! That's accelerated depreciation.
One thing it may signify, the Raiders may actually plan on keeping Maxx Crosby around for a while. But I guess that could change at any time.
QB
2 safeties
2 CBs
Edge
Guard
RB
But no WR by the 6th round. That's almost laughable. That's the position they probably needed most. I thought it was supposed to be a deep draft for WRs.
NYR, I guess Spytek is not giving up on his 2 draft picks from last year, Bech, & Thorton. But, yes, the Raiders need to cover better in the secondary, so some of these picks do make sense.
By the way, if there's a Qb that Mendoza reminds me of, it's Matt Ryan.
Just watched on YTWhy Fernando Mendoza feels Different, bloody good watch! I liked the concentration of the draft on the back end of our defence, feels like the ship has a captain again!
*Aussie Raider
I guess the Raiders graded high for their draft, probably because of Mendonza, and getting McCoy in the 4th (1st rd talent w/out injury). They also grabbed some intriguing prospects. Rome wasn't built in a day, but going into 2026 with Tucker and Nailor as WR1 and WR2 seems unrealistic. Hopefully, somebody will step up at WR. Ravens drafted Indiana WR Sarratt in the 4th, which seemed doable for the Raiders.
On paper, it looks good. It appears the Raiders may have their RB rotation. They added much needed help to defensive backfield, depth to the O-line and made Tyree Wilson expendable by picking Crawford.
There's also a long list of undrafted free agents tied to the Raiders, including multiple WRs, DTs, DBs, etc.
On a side note, one thing bothering me about the incoming regime. Apparently, Kubiak likes ZBS. Zone blocking has failed the Raiders so many times. Perhaps it's never been coached properly... but it's worth watching. I think that's why they liked Zuhn so much in the draft, because of his athleticism. ZBS might make Powers Johnson expendable. He was benched because of it last year, although he showed some chops later in the season before he was injured.
#Raiders reported UDFA Signings & Invites (from Tristen Kuhn):
QB Jacob Clark, Missouri State
QB Sawyer Robertson, Baylor
RB Roman Hemby, Indiana
WR EJ Williams, Indiana
WR Corey Rucker, Arkansas State
WR Chase Roberts, BYU
TE Matt Lauter, Boise State
T Isaiah Jatta, BYU
T Justin Pickett, Duke
NT Gary Smith, UCLA
EDGE Cian Slone, NC State
CB Caleb Offord, Kennesaw State
ILB Xavien Sorey, Arkansas
ILB Chris Thomas, Maine
SAF Tanner Wall, BYU
SAF Devin Lafayette, Troy
K Kansei "Tokyo Toe" Matsuzawa, Hawaii
LS Tyler Duzansky, Penn State
*CB Brent Austin reported to LV, but also reported to Denver, seems DEN is the correct report*
INVITES:
LB Jadon Pearson, Fresno State
OL Quincy Hughes, Wofford
OL Niklas Hennings, Queens (Canada)
OL Fintan Brose, Delaware
OL Giovanni iovino, Hawaii
P Joseph Johnson, USC
WR Daejon Reynolds, UNLV
WR/TE Michael Shulikov, Idaho State
K Nate Reed, Delaware
Looks like Daniel Carlson is done with Raiders
It's a long list and includes two undrafted players from Indiana.
I think Stukes can be the leader of the secondary the FS playing sideline to sideline, making up for others mistakes etc. The Raiders have lacked this for many years--sence Woodson perhaps. What a bust Wilson was to think we could have had Jalen Carter, McDaniels was the worst. Crawford can fly around the edge and has only played footbal for 4 years. Mendoza's floor is a top 15 QB for the next ten years his upside top lower top 10 that is fine if they build the proper suport system. That being said, I guess they will address WR and O Line next year. Sandy
Hi Sandy,
Why do you not think these haven’t been looked at? We signed a pro bowl caliber center Drafted another Guard invited in a handful of linemen. The word is they are happy with the progress that Grant has made, it’s still early camp hasn’t even begun, And you may be right and it may be that those may need to be addressed next draft, but right now it feels like we have a clear vision by our team, we may not win a bunch of games but if we show tangible improvement I will be happy.
Aussie Raider
Hi Aussie, I have cousins in Sydney and Melbourne I live in Florida. Drafting a guy in the fourth round who is a guard and going with some combo of Glaze and Grant at right tackle seems scary to me I hope I'm wrong. Don't get me wrong I agree with you that the team seems to be headed in the right direction I think it's going to take another year of acquiring Talent till they're competitive. Sandy
Out of the UFDA list, here are some players I think will probably make the team and surprise people.
Corey Rucker (WR, Arkansas St) - 75 Catches, 1,032 yards, 4 TD's last season. He is 6 foot even, 213 lbs, and has good speed. Struggles with separation, but that is coachable.
Isaiah Jatta (OT, BYU) - 6'6", 315 lbs. Was a 3 star recruit out of High School. Scouting report says: keeps QB clean, quick on the power rush, establishes himself on bull rush, has played everywhere on O-line. Weakeness: tends to get grabby, flagged 11 times last season for holding. Bites outside on fakes, leaving inside open. Only one full year as a Starter this last season in BYU as a Sr.
Gary Smith III (NT, UCLA) His collegiate career (at Duke and UCLA) he has 112 takcles (49 solo), 9.5 TFL, 4.5 Sacks, 2 FR. These are pretty good Power numbers for a NT. He is 6'2, 340 lbs. Gritty NT, that with hard work can make an impact in the League.
Caleb Offord (CB, Kennesaw St) at 6'2, 198 lbs, he played all 4 years at Kennesaw with 116 tackles (80 solo), 27 PDs, 2 FFs, 3 INTs. He is slow as a CB (4.5-40 yard dash), but can be a vicious FS.
Jadon Pearson (LB, Fresno St) 6'1, 220 lbs, 2025 stats: 105 Tackles (51 Solo), 3 PDs, 7.5 TFL, 0.5 Sacks, 1 FF and FR.
I was thinking the RB out of Indiana will stick. He was RB2 last year and still had over 1,000 yards. Actually, my bold (and weird) prediction for this year is that Jeanty is the only RB who survives from last year. I imagine Heyward remains as FB, but Washington (RB2) and Hemby (RB3) will fill the Raiders depth chart. Raiders may have upgraded at RB in an unsuspecting way.
My concern remains at WR. I'm still scratching my head why Jakobi Meyers was booted out. Meyers managed to catch over 100 passes in 2024 and not drop a single one, but he became expendable. Nailor's best year is half Meyers. Same with Tucker...
MD needs to keep Raiders! Davis family are iconic! Don't turn on him! It's bad enough we want these so called called upgrade staff and winner staff doing things new and different from Al Davis but the new staff act like they want to get rid of family attitude and just be money and act like a corporation. Those regime may win but MD should keep team...idt...he was doing much to help or hurt the foot all side of team. Maybr these coa he's can fix his ,intakes if he e er made any moves.
The problem Anon is MD is 70 with no kids so the Davis family ownership ends with him, if you want to have a family legacy you have to have kids and the must have kids or you can’t have true succession unless he decides to adopt Tom Brad..JK….And realistically if he doesn’t have a nose for NFL talent or how the organisation should be run he should step aside soon and just be a fan like the rest of us and not make any silly late in life mistakes with the team, we have already lived through that once already.
Aussie Raider
All of this about Mark selling is not so. He has to give the NFL his desires for succession in case he passes because he has no children or successor in place, which he did. It's kind of like a will. It looks like it will be sold to this group that are partners with him, much like the Dodgers.
TBH, I wish more teams set themselves up like the Green Bay Packers, where fans can buy shares into the team that gives them voting rights and first dibs at season tickets, the team has an Executive Board who along with shareholders set the annual budget, and scouting department and coaches pick the players
To date, the Green Bay Packers have 538,967 stockholders.
Imagine if the Raiders did this.....
Here's some coach's criticism of Mendoza:
""He's a good decision-maker, but I don't think he's got the NFL traits," the coach said about Mendoza. "They're all back-shoulder [throws]. That's not working in the NFL. His receivers made plays to make him look better than he is. In the NFL, those throws are getting picked off.""
That's a joke. Derek Carr made a living with back shoulder throws to his receivers. Mendoza perfected his ability to do that in college. But it's absolutely false to say ALL his throws go that way. Mendoza can make all the throws. He will be better than Carr, and that's not much of a prediction based on his intelligence, arm strength and accuracy.
With Kubiak's and Brady's help, Mendoza will find plenty of ways to outsmart defenders.
If the "coach" that said that quote about Mendoza wouldn't put his name to it, then it's meaningless to me. Probably was some former Raiders loser.
Corporate Insider,
Good not Hall of Fame draft. Good at QB and got good RB in draft. But they didn't go after top free agents and build the defense in draft, They aren't trying to win now. They seem to want to be smart snd be judges of great young player and win with a roster if them but some star free scents may mafe team a winner now! And fans will buy their story from loyalty, not trust! They need to be handed takers snd go after star free agents to win and stop the s zr c oirTe way
CI,
This is your take or something someone else said? Because this is isn’t true besides the not trying to win it all today thought.
The Las Vegas Raiders aggressively led the 2026 NFL free-agency kickoff, spending approximately $281.5 million to $283 million in total contract values during the first wave of signings. Key investments included a record-setting three-year, $81 million deal for center Tyler Linderbaum and a three-year, $35 million contract for WR Jalen Nailor Other Additions: The team also reached deals with linebackers Quay Walker, Nakobe Dean, and defensive end Kwity Paye to boost their defense. AND they kept Maxx!!! Also the focus of the draft was definitely defensive biased.
Aussie Raider
This has been the most eventful off-season in memory. Doesn't mean they nailed it, but Raiders get a big fat "A" for effort. If they still manage to sign a vet WR, that would probably be icing on the cake. Lots to be excited about moving forward...
Thanks Other Anonymous, I like Ci!
The fact is...they did good but went dull and slick, conservative team building moves mostly. While KC gets elite DBs we won't, Chargerx get elite OL we won't .It was a sugar coated program and instead if questioning office we will go for it. A 3-4 D but no free agent NG? 2, maybe 3 elite QBs in division but Raiders didn't sign a tip free agent CB? No top LBs signed as free agents? We are being played to go for the BFL get good but not expensive players and try to win. We need stars
CI,
This is Aussie Raider,
We drafted two CB’s one of which has some hi potential, we also drafted 2 safeties 1 that can play anywhere in the defensive backfield. We signed a 26 year old 3x pro bowl (23-25) stud of a center in Linderbaum. Signed 2 of the top free agent LB’s available and young to boot. The NT market was lean and not over spending there is wise
Laki Tasi fits the mould of NT besides being a bit tall 6’6” he has the mass at 373lb with 34.5” arms I am keenly watching him especially since he his a local lad. We also have some potential with Tonka and Jonah…we shall see.
Now don’t get me twisted and think I am saying we have nailed everything from draft to free agency… but what I am saying is there is a “Mintiness” in the air that we haven’t had in a long while, and I am ready to watch how this thing unfolds into this season.
Aussie Raider🏴☠️
This comment has been removed by the author.
Tough to call out mistakes before we know the facts. It's all relative. The Chiefs drafted a top CB because they lost their two starting CBs. They will actually start the 2026 season at a deficit in their defensive backfield. The Raiders used their top pick on a QB. It would be great if the Raiders could draft the top 10 players, but it doesn't work that way. And signing "star" players is usually a luxury for a good team. Yet the Raiders actually signed some star players in free agency.
With their massive haul in free agency and solid draft, I'd say the Raiders are way ahead of schedule. Sure, I would have taken a WR in round 2 but the Raiders know way more than I do.
Personally, I'm not pointing fingers at the Raiders effort so far this year. It's been impressive to watch.
Corporate Insider(aka Ci),
To Aussie, Hey! I've just come back after about 5 months, I first co melted once then! No negative criticism, they did some good things, but for years this team has been conservative, corporate smart guys and rejected a try to find those x factors, ganble and try to win now attitude that some teams used to win.They will draft DBs but not have a top veteran to win now, LBs free agents are good but they didn't get star ILBs. We are good on outside but not against run. If no star free agent NGs they needed to trade or sign a veteran.
What is it about the Raiders hiring a rookie head coach and drafting a rookie QB suggests they intend to "win now" as you suggest? If they "win now" they will exceed all expectations.
The Raiders committed to over $281 million in new contracts this off-season, second only to the Titans. Raiders signed some of the top free agents on the market and you're complaining they weren't "stars." Based on whose interpretation?
They even got Maxx Crosby back.
Corporate Insider,
To NY Raider..is that your aka?... did I get it right? Hey, nice meeting you! If I didn't know better I'd think this team is just rebuilding after a decent years of highs and lows. It's been in the basement/ for years. And when it comes to solving it, they get the same attitude and plan and thats- conservative, rookie coaches doing the corporate plan- get young players lower rounds if possible hope they are ballers, get free agents but not expensive top stars make them work into winners! Same plan, then PR then angry fans. Rookie staff, execs won't sign elite guys saving money and wanting an NFL attitude against st spending to win. And that's why we aren't better
Al Anon, that's a tough take to square. It's clearly not the same plan. They just fired Pete Carroll. And telling us they're trying to "save money" after they just committed to $281 million in new contracts is false on its face. They just spent record money. I posted that above. Google it before you shoot it down? Saying they were conservative is provably false.
Corporate Insider,
To Al Anon or NYR? Is that another aka? Hey, not hating the plan just seeing problems. IDK...I just think too many $B dumping money in us so much they are giving these people control if team and the attitude is money 1st and the fame 3rd! These people want their investment to profit and that's OK but the Raiders are just making safe, good moves but cost saving moves but not gambling and swinging for fences moves to win.
Corporate Insider,
A $B team that isn't spending more. What are they wauting, saving money for? They haven't proven they can build off good free agents, young vets and rookies. Only a few/ short list of staffs have. If Mark thought ignoring elite stars, Building off young talent and cost saving plans is his thing he needed to find guys like Don Shula, Bellichick or Dan Reeves. Those guys could do great with good, not elite guys
Mate aka CI, aka Al Anon, aka Jones… it’s Same ol same ol with you.
Raiders not spending enough…
Raiders not getting top FA…
Raiders need old coaches…
You need to cut back on the self medication and look out the window some time.
Aussie Raider
Rinse, lather and repeat. It doesn't matter when the discussion takes place, 2015, 2025 or now, Al Anon has the same talking points with no substance. He can't tell us what a so-called "star player" is, and he can't name one who was available to the Raiders during this free agency period. He has no concept of salary cap nor competition among 31 other teams for the same players. It's a zero-sum game that he expects the Raiders to win.
Seems like the Raiders have tried so many free agent QBs while they've watched one top college QB prospect after another go to other teams ahead of them over multiple drafts. Now the one time the Raiders truly have an opportunity to draft the best QB in the country, that's not good enough. Al Anon has zero patience to allow that QB and team to mature into a competitive unit, with the understanding that next year will bring further opportunities to fill holes in free agency and the draft.
Al Anon, it's you who wishes for the "same path." The win-now mentality that cost the Raiders two+ decades of misery.
Who is Al Anon? Corporate Insider(aka Ci)- came here to let fans know this is a business now, they're being played by executives who some aren't even football guys('business side' people) and we are shaken down for cash and get a 3rd rate football product...and think we got it made! Why are we supporting a system that makes B$ but dome teams won't spend to win...in some cases telling coaches to save money, ignore elite free agents try to build a winner..with good veterans and young players. Corps, B$ and Raider execs are telling coaches this and we aren't getting elite talent.
That seems grounded to you? I get it... That's a scene out of "The King of Comedy" which Robert De Niro's character lives in his mother's basement and pretends to be a standup comedian.
CI must stand for conspiracy interruption. Hopefully, we never have to change it to CSI.
Al Anon, if you're an insider, pull yourself together and name one "star" free agent the Raiders should have signed. This is the last time I will ask. Help prove your sanity. One free agent. I'm rooting for you.
Ci,
Football has really gone 101, we did lose to Cotls with a h.s. coach leading them. So, now corporate execs share or run teams.
These firms, corporations, businesses and billionaires are from all over the world. The Raiders have investors adding ideas, professional advise and wealth but they're replacing our culture with a corporate and profit motivated system and its rui ing the teams spirit.
*UFC
*MGM
*Knighthead Capital special guest Tom Brady
*unknown legal firm
Ci,
Who is Al Anon? Good thing this not politics some fans would be very lost/ explopted..
Elite Free Agents:
Sauce Gardner/ why not sign him? That was a terrible mistake.
Stars:
Jalen Ramsey/ a trade could get him, maybe not as good as past but could help our secondary.
Hunter/ ok, not star WR/CB, Jags might trade him for the right price,
Day late and a dollar short. None of those players were free agents this year, and none of them were available to the Raiders at any reasonable cost.
Gardner cost the Colts two first round picks (so you'd pick Gardner over a franchise QB?).
Ramsey plays for the Steelers thru 2028 at over $20M a year.
And NO way the Jags part with Travis Hunter. That's a joke.
There are no guardrails in your thinking. You believe the Raiders can access any player they (you) want at any time. You have no concept of salary cap or other restraints. You're playing with Monopoly money. It's more like fantasy football for you!
They will part with him because he's disappointing and expensive.
We just aren't that successful to pass over elite players and go with what we have. When did grabbing elite ts.dnt and building a monster go out of vogue? If
There were stars last year guys waived by teams, that's called a free agent, that we could've had, DB especially:
Gardner
"They will part with him because he's disappointing and expensive."
Lol, in that case, by all means, let's dump draft picks and cash and try and acquire him.
None of those players were free agents in 2026.
You expect the Raiders to ignore free agency, ignore the draft and just poach other teams' players.
Like I said, you're in fantasy football.
Ci,
Maybe not but some of them were waived. As for Hunter I think we could get him mainly he's been a disappointment and not a star at either position yet. This team probably wouldn't trade for him anyway. What they will do is sugarcoat PR with feel good stories and a few FA signings and top draft picks bit won't try to do instead with elite Free Agents and trades to boost team.
All from a regime letting g corporations run it
* Knighthead Capital and Brady
* UFC
* unknown legal firm
* Legal gambling Companies
* Private Equity Firms
* $Bs
Free agents, some free agents or guys who were released:
Sauce Gardner
Packers new CB waived by. Cowboys
Rams CB waived by KC
Other starting KC CB
LB Curtis Robinson
Dolphins DE Chubb
Instead of checking the facts, you just rinse and repeat your misinformation.
Gardner was not a free agent nor was he released. He was traded for two first round picks!
Rams traded several draft picks for Chiefs CB McDuffie, including a first-round pick.
Chiefs let Watson's rookie contract expire, so he's no "star" (at least the Chiefs didn't think so).
Robinson signed a one-year deal at or about league minimum.
As they say, you're entitled to your own opinion, but not your own facts. It appears you've engaged in the same gaslighting as last time you posted here. Very unfortunate.
Ci,
Hey, commentors and fellow.ow fans, I want to agrree to differ or talk about hpoefully a winning season...look, NYR, didn't mean to annoy you or rub you red but this is not football but "greed is good", exec run business. I know we need far more talent but refuse to admit/ do it. I think it would help to get rlite players. We are weak at DB, OG, NG and now they are moving Maxx all ovef the place. It's unfortunate that you can't see a corporate system to save money e en if we lose team still profits. Your argument might rock if we were winning and our lower ranked/ level players were dominating. Other teams win or ,use spend more and look better with guys I listed, it's fu NY you say stars do t REALLY make that big of a difference but we are ot winning
Ci,
We are a $B team..., we get money from questionable bit $B partners, we make $Ms in sales Raiders' products, we play in L.V. and we charge the 2nd most expensive tickets in the NFL. Why won't Raiders spend more on elite talentl? Who told fans that was the best attitude to win?
This is a good report from our OC Andrew Janocko. In an article on raiders.com, he said this:
"He's somebody that wants to know the whys of everything, the story behind everything," Janocko said of Mendoza. "What we're calling, but why are we calling it?
"He's really just a sponge that wants to know everything. So it's a lot of fun working with a quarterback like that because he's coming in as a blank slate in this offense - never been in this offense before - and just asking a ton of questions."
"He's asking questions that you might not have thought about in a couple of years," Janocko said, referencing his working primarily with vets in the recent past.
"It also makes you evaluate everything. 'I know we've had some success doing it one way, but we could do it another way and be even better.'"
Mendoza resembles the work ethic of Rich Gannon far more than that of JaMarcus Russell. He clearly wants to succeed. And Kirk Cousins seems to have embraced his role as mentor. On paper, this off-season has been one solid choice after another for the Raiders. Even the failed trade involving Crosby was handled like pros.
I just read a long article in the The Athletic on how Mark has now sold over 25% of the team to a combo of vc & pe guys, the people who own TKO (UFC and WWE) etc. They are totally corporate and when Mark dies with no heirs it will pass to the above mentioend parties. Combine that with the loss of homefield advantage in the move to LV, the lack of playoff success since the turn of the century it makes me worry they are becoming just another team and have lost their soul. Sandy
Ci,
I'm not sure if thats true...but Wow! I heard and know others and execs in Raiders are up to something. Fans need to ask and protest or raise boycotts of NFL this is stressful but I hope it's not that bad, some fans are worried but maybe it's rumor.
Ci,
We have a 26 game plan but it seems it's a rebuild and purposely going for 27 and more draft picks in 27. A 3-4 but no loop NG, ignoring top LBs in free agency and draft- Dean is O.K. but we need a elite ILB. CROSBY...,an OLB? We don't have younger talent...not Walker at OLB? And why try trade Crosby? .rmore problems and reason to argue about defense...DBs and comp if it. Not trying to be mean w its fellow fans opinions ...NyR,, Yountville. But I think...p,ayingvfans thinking win snow but showing they really aren't going to try is sorry and sad
The Raiders have been uniquely unsuccessful at navigating the modern NFL. 40 years of "win-now" mentality has gotten them nowhere, so asking for more of the same is, by definition, insanity.
The great Pete Carroll brought in savvy vets last year to try and "win now" and look what that got us.
2026 presented an opportunity for the Raiders to draft the best QB in college, something they've wanted to do for many years now but were unable.
So here we are. Drafting Mendoza and suggesting they "win now" could not be more diametrically opposed.
Ci,
We support then but who are they? If we got 100 different owners why do we expect continuity- if they're messing in the football side of business? This is a machine like system, valuing their accountants and marketing people to have them find cost trimming ways to build a team. But our new WBs don't have top talent help them win. Defense doesn't have top NG and CBs. Facts are as big for me as yors
There's nothing "cost-trimming" about the NFL and certainly not the Raiders who regularly (annually) sign record-breaking contracts, but you continue to call them out as being too cheap. Raiders probably led the NFL in signing players to record-breaking contracts over their 20+ year era of failures... so just spending money on high-priced players clearly isn't the answer.
In reality, there is no way to replace an entire team in one off-season. Ask Pete Carroll and every Raiders regime that's tried. WR is the only position that the Raiders truly left a glaring weakness, but the off-season isn't over yet.
For me, I don't want them to sign or trade for some high-priced diva WR. I'd rather watch maturation of WRs on the roster and carry the need into next off-season when they can prioritize WR in the draft and in free agency.
The Raiders had too many holes to fill in one year... and not enough room in the salary cap to spend as you suggest. Not sure why you don't get that.
Dumbest move during the Spytek era was trading Jakobi Meyers.
June 1st. New year. Lots of movement today. I'm glad the Raiders didn't mortgage anything away to get some overpriced player(s) in a year which is clearly set for rebuilding.
Pats got AJ Brown. Rams traded 3 draft picks and Jared Verse for Miles Garrett. That's fine for them... they are SB contenders. The Raiders are coming off their worst season in 20 years. Draft capital and future salary cap are far too valuable right now.
On paper, this off-season has many highlights...
The NFL needs to investigate the Patriots deal with AJ Brown, as this was documented as happening by Russini via Vrabel in their kinky relationship sex talks. Patriots should be fined, lose draft picks, and possibly hand out suspensions for tampering.
Ci,
Theres little that you can say is legit about the business side of the NFL NY....it's a hustle that is now outright sad and outrageous! The idea that they're honestly spending on their roster is ridiculous. Once one of pro sports' bidders for talent refuses to even look at top FAs' and it has cost us badly! Since obviously. we aren't leading young vets and our draft picks or FAs maybe a few elite stars might boost this team.
Ci,
So NY....we don't need to gamble...like making a big trade or/ and spend on elite FA to win? Capital? We are saving it for what? QBs don't have WR, or D don't have top NG and OL dont have OG or RT. So we don't need Verse or Brown? We can't use new DE for pass rush or WR for new QBs? Did Pars and Rams mess up and got played getting top stars?
First, you're conflating the NFL (league) with the Raiders (organization). The Raiders are not trying to "hustle" you. Everything they have done has been very purposeful.
The Raiders drafted a QB and told us they wouldn't play him right away and even backed that up by signing a vet QB who will start Game 1 but is almost guaranteed to be gone next season. How much more evidence do you need to understand they are not retooling to win this year, they are rebuilding for the future.
So complaining the Raiders aren't trading away critical future draft picks and spending more money on players who can't change anything, except maybe bring a couple wins this year... sounds like a crack addict. This iteration of the Raiders may not be for you. You're looking for a quick fix.
FYI, AJ Brown doesn't want to play for the Raiders! Neither does Jared Verse. They were both traded to contending teams for ransoms that would only stand to weaken the Raiders and their obvious plan, had the Raiders been involved.
Ci,
I'm just trying to figure this team out and expose the holes it shows. Don't think I know it all NY..I think you believe your feelings. But since when do players tell owners who they will play for? Do they know how to use capital? Maxx is on the trade block and no WR for new QBs why not go for elite players to win a playoff spit?
"...since when do players tell owners who they will play for?"
Clearly, that's not what I said.
If you're going to criticize the Raiders for not getting a top WR, funny, you haven't said a word about trading away Jakobi Meyers. Meyers was the best WR on the Raiders roster after Devante Adams. He had 87 receptions, over 1,000 yards and zero drops two years ago (as WR2) and the Raiders refused to extend him. But you disregard that notion because Meyers has never played in your paper mache pro bowl.
You make it sound so easy. "Raiders should just go get Travis Hunter, he's available." Sorry, but that's not steeped in reality. You're playing fantasy football.
Raiders off-season roster is loaded with WRs, including rookies from Indiana with whom Mendoza played. If you 'know it all' as you suggest, then you understand this is a process that will take time.
Ci,
Losded?
Denver- loaded w/ pass rushers they will compete for the West title. They can beat better teams w/ a strong DL and D
LACs- loaded staff and OL...they can win West e/ strong run game and they have star WN. O still isn't 'lights out ' or close or elite but it will compete w/ top teams.
KC- loaded staff, DBs and star QB. Why are we being:played'/ fooled to buy that we will win without elite stars when KC always gets elite FAs?
We aren't seeing football side control but accountants and others control/ running team or making football side decisions
The Raiders have 15 WRs on their off-season roster, two on IR. You don't think that's a lot? They have several young and vet WRs they obviously regard highly. They just need one or two guys to stand out.
Your AFCW assessments are weak. FYI, KC lost both their starting CBs.
And nobody said the Raiders "will win." That came from you. Again, the Raiders are not trying to fool you. They have been purposeful and obvious.
Ci,
Hey NY! glad to hear from you! This team has billions and they are getting richer so....where's the issue? Fans are spending on them...really spending; And they (fans/ others) are charged maybe top 5 ticket prices in the NFL! Shouldn't they then try to find players to noisy us to contenders? You don't feel a few elite players might noisy us?
You're a cart-in-front-of-the-horse guy. You want something because it looks pretty. Like a little kid, you marvel over shiny packaging instead of playing with the toy inside.
You repeatedly saying 'spend money and add elite players' lacks context.
-Context about the insane level of turnover the Raiders have already undertaken.
-Context about a complete turnover in coaching that includes a rookie HC and rookie DC.
-Context about a timetable to transition a rookie QB into a new offense.
-Context about West Coast offense which the Raiders will employ and the type of WRs they need.
-Context about what players are available to the Raiders.
-Context about salary cap.
-Context about mortgaging the Raiders future in salary and draft capital.
The Raiders just underwent a heart transplant and you expect them to run a marathon.
Ci,
Hey NY....font want to get on your heels...Yesterday, you talked WRs and the West. We got a loaded WR room/ group but no star. KC lost 2 star CBs but got one future star. The West has 3 playoff teams why did we ignore elite stars to help us and did we get better/ do something to win now?
Ci,
Why keep capital for a team that misses and misfires like us? Win now may force some pressure and gambling to compete now! They can't keep rebuilding....it's a business move not football side, passion move. It's a hustle and fans are being fooled
Same lack of context in your words. Here's some context; calling it a hustle doesn't make it a hustle. Bring some facts. You just keeping throwing crap against the wall hoping it will stick. No actual plan. Just fantasy football.
Funny, you call the Chiefs' rookie a "future star" but you think "star" players only exist on the Raiders if the Raiders spend lots of money and give up future draft picks... because, as you say, 'why keep capital' right?
"Raiders can't keep rebuilding"? What? Did you think the Raiders were rebuilding last year by signing every aged veteran Pete Carroll ever worked with? So now that they're actually in a rebuild you want to squash it before it even begins by dumping loads of money and draft picks on "star players".
It's all nonsensical.
Ci,
Hey NY! Don't mean to heat your seat... I just want a change from our team! The accountants run this team and it's easy to see the 'game plan'. They spend but really because they have to look like they are trying. Loaded at WR? Unknowns and 1 decent FA signing. KC? They get elite talent and drafted s good DB. Adams and Myers? Raiders let best QBs go do that ruined them.
'Accounts game plan'? It's called salary cap and every team has it.
Over the past 20 years, the Raiders have signed your expensive 'star' free agents and it's gotten them nowhere. They brought in the best WRs in the league, e.g., Randy Moss, Michael Crabtree, Devante Adams and others, and they have yet to win a playoff game since 2003.
Your plan has already failed... like 20 times.
You say you want change but you're asking for more of the same and calling it 'change.' The Raiders are going the opposite direction of your suggestion, and it's exactly what they need to try... something different.
And, yes, the Raiders have a lot of WRs, and they will probably sign another one before the season. Nailor was odd man out in MN, behind Jefferson and Addison. Nailor might excel for the Raiders as a featured WR. Tucker keeps getting better. If the Raiders get 1-2 WRs to step up behind these two guys, they should have a solid group to go with the best TEs in the league. Bech and Thorton were underachievers on a very bad team last year. Expectations are high for Bech, especially, in WC offense.
You keep complaining the Raiders should bust the bank and give away the farm (AJ Brown style) and you have no idea what they might already have -only that they haven't played in your paper mache pro bowl.
Ci,
Salary cap? No...it's called "a hustle" it's part of business and it's o.k. maybe great if there's quality with the product and business shows passion/ care even if they disappoint/ put out so so or lower product than competition. They are a billion $ business that isn't spending on elite talent to save $millions
Ci
NY said in an early post I think, he was saying I think we are trying to win now....No, never said that I said I wish they'd try it. Rebuilding is a terrifying thought! It's just something we do not do well! I knew they were rebuilding NY. Next year? Trading Maxx, going e/ youth but not getting elite FAs and not getting top ER got out QBs think they ard building and know what to d
There's no solution for you. You don't want a rebuild because you say, 'it's not something they do well'. Perhaps, but they suck at retooling too.
When you sign a vet QB to play for one year (or less) while you prepare a rookie, it's a rebuild. That's undisputable.
But Rome wasn't built in a day. Certainly they want better WRs, but it didn't play out that way. Free agency and the draft went a different direction, and the Crosby trade debacle probably caused the WR position to be left out of top consideration. Stuff happens.
This year is more about getting started. It's an inaugural year. They have new coaches, new players (more than any subsequent year will experience), and new installations at every phase and at every position. Spending more money and trading draft picks can't change any of that.
Throwing money at a problem and expecting it to change is silly (if I'm being polite). The type of (elite) player you want is a luxury for a contending team. That's how the NFL and its payscale work. The Rams traded for Myles Garret because they think he's the missing link to a SB. The Patriots overachieved in their inaugural season, so they shot the moon for AJ Brown for the same reason.
What you're asking the Raiders to do, IMO, is largely why they've sucked at for so long. You're begging for more failure. Even in bad years, it was always the Raiders (and not just Al Davis) who signed these type luxury players when they should have been rebuilding.
The Raiders are doing exactly opposite of what you want and it's the right thing to do. They are sellers, not buyers. Trading Crosby was probably the right move. It failed but it will probably still happen.
'Stars' are going, not coming, and it's got you perplexed.
It's not just a sports model, it's a business model. Stars don't grow on trees. They're developed through good coaching. That's why the Raiders hired Klint Kubiack and he hired his staff... to coach the young players up.
As I said before, this iteration of the Raiders is not for you.
Stefon Diggs and Brandon Aiyuk could both be available, should the Raiders want to pull that trigger. Both are elite WRs but either one could be a headache for any team, although I think Diggs was just cleared by the NFL. As I said before, it might not change anything for the Raiders, who are starting at ground zero across every facet of the team. If the Raiders believe Bech or Thorton Jr., or any other WR(s) may grow into a significant role in the future, getting a quick fix now with Diggs or Aiyuk might hurt more than help the team down the road.
I don't expect the Raiders to move on either of these guys. I could be wrong.
Hey NY! Fans really get it wrong...sometimes! You are on the spot...in a way....in other ways, wrong! I know you understand this era pro soirts and love the Raiders. Fans aren't looking at the 'business side' and teams PR.and feel good and positive news program by megis to make fans love the system and not see they're being 'plsyef'. The team is worth billions, it's getting richer, its getting more things for its fans and stadium and it's getting more wealthy fans and companies to work partner or visit, get money or spend money on,/ with. But they don't vommitt the same yo the game. A new QB who mwith help might win this year and no help for the future starzWB. A few elite players might boost us today. We are we back at rebuilding and I feel a swing for fended move might get fans motivated to go to games
Ci,
Everybody....to all NFL fans...Happy Fathers Day? To the dads hope you got higtx and had good day
Ci,
Diggs- might be better...IMO. the owners have cost saving systems in their teams but don't have many(some but IMO....hardly any) rules stopping who they do/ can do business w/ to get money. Raiders are getting millions(maybe soon it'll be billions) and have climbed to one of powerful and best place for investors and wealthy teams in NFL. But they don't feel or seem to worry about building a winnrt. They spend safely and that's possibly why we don't win. You sometimes can spend big not being a contender to start winning. S 1 yr. Vet QB with talent might win now. We don't get elite FAs, trade for stars and wr lose so why not look good? We do ygf sand things and lkse
Context! It doesn't matter how much money the Raiders or Mark Davis has, or how much they make in ticket sales, signing players is done completely within the framework of a salary cap which all teams must abide.
This year's salary cap is ~$301 million, and the Raiders have about $23 million to spend. $23M is nothing. It's certainly not "billions" you keep telling they have to spend. Yours is a false premise.
Ci,
Maybe you're right about the cap sand to he fact they've been spending but doesn't it kinda make you wonder?.....other teams will pick top rated players wd seem to s in our them and draft reaches. We want to trade our best but can we get equal product from Maxx/ others we trade,? Kinda poves my point?...when you say they spend but they avoid top FAs. But we won't do like other teams at least they are exciting if losing but we might ein
Here's a fun fact: There's nothing that proves your point.
The Raiders spent the second most money in league this year. They spent $308M in free agency. Only the Titans spent more. But the Raiders also provided $236M in guaranteed money, which the most in the league... by a long shot. Guaranteed money is the amount they are truly committed to, and it's more than any other team. The next most was $194M, or almost 20% less than the Raiders.
Tyler Linderbaum signed for $80M
Kwity Paye almost $50M
Quay Walker over $40M
Nakobe Dean $36M
Jalen Nailor $35M
Kirk Cousins $11.8M
Malcome Koonce $11M
Eric Stokes $30M
The Raiders absolutely hemorrhage money this off-season, but you kept saying they're cheap and never spend money.
https://overthecap.com/free-agency-spending
Ci,
If we got stake holders.dumpiing loads of cash in Raiders' laps and a lot of companies, sponsors and commercial advertisers investing and moving their safes in them it kinda makes you ask why be cheap? I looked at the cap and it sure looks like a ' hustle '. Spending only on cheaper talent with a few top draft picks and expensive vets. But no elite players. They have spent like others and hundreds of millions but others went for elite stars and then tried to save money when they stopped win ing or failed to win. Seems it's our move to keep rebuilding but fans need to say "go for winning now!"
We are getting ready to enter Training Camp, and dwindling down to the 53 man Roster, to pre-season/regular season. This is an exciting time. I want to share my thoughts on where the Raiders need to improve this season that will make me happy.
First, is the O-Line. Last season, they looked lost on their assignments almost every play. I blame the coaching on that last year, but I also blame the lack of leadership/Captain of the O-Line. The Captain of the O-Line is usually the Center, which is where the Raiders have really lacked. Jordan Meredith really struggled in this role, and JPJ was no better. Tyler Lindenbaum has great experience in this role, and this is a HUGE pick up that we have made since Rodney Hudson. Another area on the O-Line is going to be how they utilize our strengths. The biggest killer of the O-Line last season was a pure ZBS blocking scheme, when we have the roster for a hybrid of Zone Power Block. If the game is won in the trenches, then you have to be aggressive in the trenches. JPJ, Trey Zuhn, and Caleb Rogers are power hitters at OG, and they need to be unleashed. The 2 areas of concern on the O-Line are RT and Kolton Miller's health.
Secondly, I feel the same with the D-Line. Crosby is a beast, and someone else needs to step up. This has been a problem since before Crosby, this was a problem when we had Khalil Mack too. Raiders made it clear they are moving to a 3-4 base, without a true 3-4 roster on Defense. Not sure this is a good idea, and D-Line may be the biggest weakness coming into the season. The only true NT we have at the moment is Laki Tasi (6'6", 373 lbs), JJ Pegues (6'2", 323 lbs). How are they going to utilize Maxx, is he still going to line up on the D-Line or OLB? Other than Pegues, we also have Tonka Hemingway and Adam Butler, how are they going to utilize this trio? One of these guys are going to have to step up and put pressure on the QB, and alleviate the double teams off Crosby.
Third, is Cornerback, which is made up mostly of really young guys. Eric Stokes and Taron Johnson are the only guys with more than 3 years experience. Who is the #1 CB? How are they going to utilize Darien Porter, Decamerion Richardson, and Greedy Vance? Stokes was a good pick-up for the Raiders, but one of these young guys is going to have to step up BIG and prove they can be an elite shutdown CB.
The biggest thing I want to see out of the Raiders as a whole, is to be more aggressive in the trenches on both sides of the ball. If Kubiak and Company can lead them to do that, then the Raiders will win. I also want to see them utilize the younger players they drafted this year and last year better. I want to see Jack Bech, Donte Thornton, and Malik Benson spread the field at WR. I want to see a heavy punch of Jeanty and Laube at RB, and I want to see better play calling on offense in the redzone. We have a good team, and now, I feel we have good coaching; its time to put it together and JUST WIN, BABY!
That was comprehensive, Nate. However, I see things a little differently. Raiders are in a transition period. They just turned over ~70% of their roster and have all new coaches (some first-timers at their positions). In many respects, they don't yet know what players or even what system(s) will work best. They just spent the 2nd most money in the NFL, although there's a guy repeatedly posting here how cheap they are. Rome wasn't built in a day. And this version of the Raiders will take more than one year. Look no further than Cousins, who will not be a Raider next year. This is a work in progress. Make no mistake, there will be holes to fill next season. But we will need this season to find them.
It's easy to say players need to step up, but the Raiders will also find success through attrition, i.e., players simply being replaced. I don't see guys like Thorton Jr or Laube contributing at a high level. Bech? Maybe in a WC offense, but last year was no prize. If this offseason was successful, Nailor will lead the WR group, Benson will play a significant role at WR and Washington will be RB2.
Raiders have a lot of DTs on their roster, and IMO it won't be Tasi, who lacks experience. That rotation might surprise us all. They did make some transition to 3-4 but perhaps not fully. Nonetheless, their LBs are better in coverage than past squads, and they've added depth at DB covering slot.
I feel good about new coaching and much of the personnel they brought in, but I remain cautiously optimistic about this season. I see it mostly as prep for next year. I don't want to call it a "honeymoon year" for Kubiak or his staff because they have their work cut out for them. It's all hands on deck.
NY,
I absolutely feel confident about the coaching staff. Outside of Linderbaum, the players that have been picked up have played with the DC or Kubiak in the past, so I don't think it will be a problem of them picking up the system. I know they are a work in progress, but these are the improvements I want to see this season. As far as Thorton and Laube's contribution, they are currently on the roster, and came in last season with great expectation and ceiling; I'd like to see them and Bech get the opportunity to showcase why they were drafted and brought to the team before they are discarded, and given that opportunity with a different team.
As far as this season, I'm not saying we will win the Super Bowl, but I want to see improvements. I would like to see a 3-4 week winning streak. If I were the HC, my immediate goal for the season would be 7-9 wins. I want to see the team play smart (less penalties) and be aggressive. I want to see the coaches and players be confident in the knowledge of their game plan, assignments, and confident in each other. Confidence is the result of clear goals, which produces more confidence and wins for the team. That is what I want to see from the Raiders this season: Confidence!
It will be very interesting to watch unfold...
Media reporting that Derek Carr would return to a team which is a super bowl contender. No offense to Derek (I'm a big fan), but would that team still be a SB contender if he joins them to play QB? I assume he's only interested in "starter's money". Again, no offense intended but Carr is retired and out of practice at the NFL level, and he's never won a playoff game in his career.
That said, he once had a knack for comebacks, mostly cut short by bad defenses.
I would like him to succeed... but wishful thinking isn't gonna be enough.
NY,
I hear conflicting reports on that too. Then you have reports that he is content with being out of the league and retired. I wonder if he is dropping hints to Minnesota, San Fran, Arizona, or even Dallas. I know he loves his ties to California and Texas. I think he would definitely succeed, depending on the team. His career, like his brother, cut short to bad management and offensive line. He was successful when the Raiders had a great O-Line, even though he never won a playoff game, he did put the Raiders in position to win, the Raiders never really gave him a support cast. 2016 still hurts because I'd love to have seen how far they would have gone had he not been injured. Let's not forget, people say he should have been on the bench in that time, but the Colts were making a comeback because lack of defense.
Ci,
The main reason Maxx was expendable was money,! 30$ saved if he's gone,! He's #1'star we have and our D will need some new talent! I think spending would help...not good, decent talent but about 2-4 elite guys! Hey want to make huge revenue and be a v as luable team but don't feel they want to take chance and donf m ok t Ed ty owin.
Ci,
They want to be a more valuable team, get more investors, partners and sponsors- and the hey have some ond of the most expensive prices fir games; but they don't seem to feel like doing it too- spending their money to gey ststs yo win
Ci,
With the cap in good shape we could trade for a star NG or OL. '27!? It's questionable. But they are t saying wait and we get wealthier next year. Getting more money and sponsors d more things for fans to spend on. But they are cost saving building team they could sign kte FAs to win now
The salary cap is the same for every team, and every team is required to spend it, or they have to pay a fine to the NFL. The Raiders are no exception! The idea they need to gain wealth through stakeholders and sponsorships so they can afford more players is a completely false premise.
What you continue to misread is that the Raiders are executing a plan to develop their team.
If the Maxx Crosby trade had gone through, the Raiders would have a top WR from this year's draft. But the trade didn't happen. And instead of spending recklessly, as you want them to, they will likely work toward evaluating the team they assembled, which involved massive turnover of the roster, before committing to stupid money contracts. Training camp hasn't even started yet. Lots of things could still happen... but thankfully they are not as desperate as you seem to be.
Ci,
Hey NY! No...you're right about the cap it you missed my point. I say to this team is far wealthier than it's 1st LV year and getting/ building more revenue. Theyve turned into a big team ino a top corporation and have the big value and are getting more investment. But that's great for NFL and owners and investors but that's on the 'business side' of the game not football So maybe some of that money could go for elite players you have opinion they shouldn't but as gee stars may help
Ci,
Maxx was gone ASAP to save money! Trade gell through. They signed 49ers OG to start but now are t sure...mistakes happen to all teams but if a top OH or CB were available IDzT...theyf sign him/ them. 59rrs OG, Vickings WR were discount FAs
Crosby was traded for draft picks. Raiders had plenty of salary cap space to pay him and still do. Money was not the driving force behind the trade. They may still trade him but they aren't asking for money. And if they are so cheap (as you claim) and just wanted to save Crosby's salary, he'd already be gone.
NY, it's terrifying to think of this team with a lot of draft picks! Sound strange? But they just have had a bad time making good picks! Then, they talk 'be patient or more time' 'hreat group/ crop' or great crop/ group of rookies. But they traded our(2 of) elite stat to get those picks. They do o PR to get us pumped.
but they don't spend to replace our star using discount FSs or a guy on the team to replace him and go with that but we have trouble competing and we still aren't better than last year
Ci,
No elite WR for Cousins why? No top NG for the D, No elite- vet CB, and no top OT for Cousins but next year we 'kick ass'? Oh yes it's about saving money but also pleading who are these stake holders and why all the cash in Raiders if they aren't demanding/ hollering for a fast rebuild and elite talent?
I'll tell you why no elite WR for Cousins, because he's not the Raiders QB. You comment here like you have no idea what's happening. Raiders put all their stock in Mendoza. But Mendoza's not ready, so the Raiders aren't in a hurry to complete their roster, especially, not in a hurry to make a big contract mistake. Thankfully, they're not as desperate as you. You're a day trader... or maybe just an addict. You need a quick fix. What if the Raiders sign an "elite" WR now, guarantee his huge contract and watch him get injured before Mendoza ever sees the field. Brilliant! Elite players are for teams ready to make a run. Raiders are coming off arguably their worst season in the history of the franchise, and you're wondering why they aren't making a run. It's laughable.
FYI, Kirk Cousins is not the QB he once was. He's 37 and phasing out. Unless he excels, he will soon be the backup... and that's the plan.
Ci,
If you had the chance to bring in top WR for future QB do it now or later? Would you wait to get elite players for the D or start signing them now? You want to build a top OL in '37 or get some players signed now? I'm asking.....do you get a few stars now maybe try for a playoff run or wait to draft and trade and sign players in '37?
.
Stock in a rookie but no OL and WR stock? Chargers built a good OL for QB, even Dever tries to get good talent for QB what's so hard about doing the simplest things? A team ruining its best player 28 years old by not getting a top NG from trade or draft and no top CB. didn't we once dominate/ reputation for CBs? No, cost saving and greed not going further on 'goigball didr' of team
You don't bring any receipts with your comments. You're not even armed with facts. You comment from a position of misunderstanding. You say the Raiders are cheap and they won't spend, but they've spent (and guaranteed) more money than every team in the league. No OL? Raiders made a huge investment in their OL, paying a record contract for Linderbaum. You say they should sign an elite WR but you can't say who, and when you finally give a name, it's Travis Hunter... who is completely unavailable.
I'm pretty much done with all this repetition, but I will leave you with this. The Raiders have had some of the best WRs in the league, but that's rarely been the key to their success. Anytime the Raiders have enjoyed success in their long history, they've had a top center. Otto, Dalby, Mosbar, Robbins, and even Hudson. Thanks to their spending big $$, they once again have a top center in the league.
They will sign and draft more WRs, but it probably won't happen the way you envision, and that probably won't stop them from being formidable again. Take a breath and give it a chance. Training camp hasn't even begun.
Denico Autry is expected to retire. Raiders (Gruden!) made a big mistake allowing Autry to walk in free agency just as he was becoming a solid Edge. Then Gruden traded Mack and left the Raiders with a huge void in pass rush which they never really recovered, even with Maxx Crosby on the roster.
Autry has 331 tackles, 65.5 sacks, 117 quarterback hits, 35 passes defensed and eight forced fumbles. Very solid numbers! I was always a fan.
Ci,
Hey Raidernation!
Big money rolled in this year from these new stake holders! Tourism and of course...
ticket sales puts Raiders in the bank and wealthy top group/ top 10 in pro sports. They may spent big cash but why did they.sign discount FAs? What sense did it make to pass/ ignore on elite stars and get good- above average FAs? Is that the way this team thinks it can win with?
Post a Comment
<< Home